Research peptide retailer
Tested Peptides
No public CoA access
See how Tested Peptides compares across the Trust Index →Site largely unfinished build ('Pardon our dust'), only generic '>99% HPLC-tested' claim, no CoA, no named lab, no company registration anywhere; own Trustpilot reviews report company unable to provide batch info when asked.
Headline price
Not disclosed
Regulated as
Not disclosed
Delivery area
Not disclosed
Certificate of Analysis profile
CoA per batch
No
Access
none
Lab
Unnamed — site claims "99% Lab-Tested" but does not name a specific third-party lab
QR-verifiable
No
Founded
Not disclosed
Companies House
17389831
Baseline last reviewed
2026-08-19
Re-checked on a rolling basis, not a fixed monthly cycle; see the last-verified date above. See methodology for how this is scored.
Separate from Testing Transparency
Responsible Practice assessment
Material concerns- · Unqualified property claim ('known for its regenerative properties') without a research-study qualifier, beside the disclaimer.
- · Benefit-claim language observed on site: ""BPC-157 (Body Protection Compound-157) is a synthetic peptide known for its regenerative properties." (on BPC-157 product page, alongside strict RUO/in-vitro-only disclaimer language on same page)"
We assess what a brand publishes and makes available to customers, not its intentions. Full framework and what each status means: how we assess brands. Think this is wrong? Email hello@peptideclear.co.uk with evidence.
Not yet Independently Verified
The Testing Transparency and Responsible Practice results above are free and the same for every retailer. Nobody has commissioned the deeper Independent Verification process for Tested Peptides yet. Request that it be run →
Our verdict
Last reviewed 2026-08-19. PeptideClear earns nothing when readers click through, and this link carries no tracking. Editorial criteria are documented in our methodology.
Ready to start?
Visit Tested Peptides →
No commission earned. Untracked link, direct to Tested Peptides.